Not what you were looking for? Try Google Search:
Showing posts with label volatility. Show all posts
Showing posts with label volatility. Show all posts

Made In America: The "Credit Crunch"

A lot has been said about the volatility of stock markets due to the "sub-prime" mortgage woes in America and the so-called "credit crunch". This has been going on for almost a year now. This is a 100% 'Made in America' problem that is affecting everyone worldwide - finally something that is not 'Made in China'!

It took me a while to understand how the sub-prime loans and the credit crunch were related and how they were affecting the economy. I'm sure there are many who still do not understand what the credit crunch is all about. Let me try to explain:

- Banks have a "prime" rate, which is the lowest or best interest rate that is offered to people with a perfect credit rating.

- People with a less-than-perfect credit rating have to pay a premium on top of the prime interest rate.

- The premium is to compensate the lender for taking on the additional risk of loaning money to someone who may not be able to pay it back.

- Generally speaking, banks do not lend money to people with poor credit ratings.

- However, in the U.S., amidst the booming real estate market, many mortgages were sanctioned to Americans with poor credit ratings, on some seemingly good terms.

- Under the terms, the lenders charged a special interest rate which was below the prime rate (i.e. "sub-prime"), for the first three years.

- The catch was that after three years, the rate would reset to a rate significantly higher than the prime rate.

- The lenders, in the mean time, would immediately "sell" the mortgages, which are their assets (loan receivables), to investment companies.

- The investment companies, would "re-package" the mortgages into what are called "CDOs" or Collateralized Debt Obligations, which are in turn sold to investors all over the world. The investors were mainly big banks, brokerages and hedge funds in the U.S. and Europe.

- CDOs are nothing more than different types of loan receivables - e.g. credit card receivables, mortgage receivables (including sub-prime) etc.

- Ratings companies, like S&P and Moody's, gave a higher rating to the CDO than any individual receivable in it.

- The reasoning was that if one of the loan defaults, it still wouldn't affect the CDOs ability to pay interest - due to diversification of loans.

- The problems began when after three years, the interest rates reset to higher rates. Americans found it difficult to make their (now higher) monthly mortgage payments and faced foreclosures.

- With foreclosures numbering in the hundreds of thousands every month, investors began to question the value of their investment: the CDO.

- Ratings' agencies cut the rating on some mortgage-backed securities (like CDOs) from investment grade to pure junk status in one calendar year!

- This triggered massive panic among investors and the market for CDOs quickly dried up. Many panic-stricken investors sold these at a fraction of what it cost them to buy.

- Not knowing the true value of the CDOs they held, many investors who did not sell were forced (due to mark-to-market regulation) to take massive write-downs on the value of these investments. The write-downs have so far totalled almost half a trillion dollars and analysts expect the total to reach $1 trillion before it is all over.

- Now, "credit crunch" is when lenders are unwilling to lend money ("credit") to businesses. This happened because the lenders (banks) had lost billions in the CDO market and some no longer had the cash even to stay afloat, let alone lend money to others. If banks don't lend money, they don't make any money.

- The banks are even afraid to lend to each other because they don't know what the other bank's exposure to CDOs is, and their ability to pay back.

- If businesses are unable to borrow money (to expand or to pay their own obligations), then they either cut-back on expansion plans or may even go into bankruptcy, thus resulting in recessionary conditions.

- If individuals are unable to borrow, then they may have to declare bankruptcy or hold-off on buying big-ticket items like houses, automobiles and appliances, again, leading to recessionary conditions.

Quite interesting the way capital markets work!

My Take on Investing and Life

On Technical Analysis (TA):

Nothing but mumbo-jumbo. Makes enough sense that it is easy to fall prey for it - the lure of fast money, after all, is too much for most people. I myself have tried it and failed miserably. I learned my lesson. I think if you live by TA, then you will die by TA. TA is an art, rather than a skill. Most people cannot expect to make any money using TA. See
A Tale of the Speculator and Technical Analysis for more.

On gambling:

I don't gamble in the stock market. Nor do I play the lottery. Taking some calculated risks in the market is not the same as gambling. I'm primarily a long-term investor with an investment horizon of 10 years or more. I won't be jumping off a bridge if the market drops 30% tomorrow!

On volatility:

I love market volatility. I think most people misuse that word; they use it without even understanding what it means. They think volatility is bad. In fact, volatility is what gives me the opportunity to make money in the stock market. Whether I actually exploit those opportunities is another story! One of my New Year's resolution is to have more courage to open doors when investment opportunities knock. I think I'm on the right track.

On Modern Portfolio Theory:

Not everything needs to be "measured" or "quantified". Security analysts these days are obsessed with measuring everything from risk to volatility. Standard deviation and variance are standard measures of risk, and volatility can be measured by beta. Small investors cannot be expected to know how to calculate these things and are therefore easy to entice to seek professional help. Nor can anyone expect small investors to know how to construct a portfolio in which the correlation of any pairs of securities is close to zero (this is one of the definitions of a "diversified portfolio"). The calculations involved here are indeed mind-boggling! I don't think one needs to know these calculations to make money in the market. The impression given to a small investor is that you cannot do it alone. I disagree. I think in most cases you can do better alone. In fact, I think you are better off not knowing these things!

On EBIT and EBITDA:

Analysts pay too much attention to useless numbers like EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) and EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest Taxes Depreciation and Amortization). The problem with these numbers is that interest and taxes are "real" expenses that we cannot simply ignore. What is the purpose of excluding interest and taxes from earnings when both have to be paid? As far as non-cash expenses like depreciation are concerned, they too are very real. You will find out exactly what depreciation is if you buy a car today and sell it tomorrow, or if you've ever had to do repairs/maintenance on your home. Depreciation accounts for these expenses.

On analyst ratings and recommendations:

Analysts are constantly upgrading and downgrading stocks. They have to do this to justify their existence. Frankly speaking, I don't think it is possible to make money listening to analyst recommendations. Many times I have seen analysts upgrading a stock when it has hit a 52-week high or even an all-time high, and downgrading a stock when it has been beaten down by too much pessimism. Not that they're always wrong, but they're wrong enough times to blur the distinction between a professional and an amateur. Generally speaking, I tend to pay more attention to their research on a company (which can be insightful) than their rating or recommendation.

On EPS:

Assuming all else is equal, is a company that earns $5.00/share a better value than a company that earns $2.50/share? Yes. What about a company that earns -$5.00/share compared to one that earns -$2.50/share? Which one is a better value? It is not necessarily the company that earns -$2.50/share. An understanding of how EPS is calculated will clarify why this is so. EPS is calculated by dividing net income by the number of shares outstanding. The fewer shares a company has outstanding the more income is attributed to each share (and therefore, each shareholder). This means that if a company has a large loss, then it can make its loss appear smaller, in EPS terms, by simply issuing more shares, which is bad for existing shareholders. This is why a negative EPS is not always very meaningful.

On charity:

If I donate, I want to donate because I want to. If I volunteer, I want to volunteer without expecting anything in return. It's sad to see some people who volunteer because they want a prestigious 'certificate of recognition'. Donating a suitcase full of clothes from Canada to a remote mountain village in India is probably the best thing I have ever done in my life. I think I was inspired by Dr. Prakash Amte (son of late
Baba Amte).

On mountains:

Why do I love the mountains so much? They give me immeasurable peace of mind and happiness. There's a certain excitement in hearing and watching a bird swoosh past you. Watching an everyday phenomenon - a sunset - is a much-anticipated event and a real treat for the eyes. Every time I'm there, I say to myself, "what a wonderful world!"

Besides that, I have learned so many things about myself because of mountaineering - that I have an incredible amount of energy and will power. Now I just hope to harvest some of that energy and will power for other things.

My life ain't promised but it'll sure get better... until then, you'll find me in a cubicle!

The Investor and Market Volatility


Looks like the bulls are tired of running. Global markets saw a significant decline in the month of May due to rising global interest rates and falling commodity prices. Rising interest rates makes stocks less attractive and bonds more attractive. Consequently, money flows out of the stock market and into the bond market, which results in a decline in the stock market.

Not a day goes by where in the words 'volatile' or 'volatility' are not used in the daily business news. Volatility is a characteristic of a security or market to rise or fall sharply in price within a short-term period. Mathematically, volatility is the annualized standard deviation of returns.

After listening to market analysts talking on business news and after reading news articles, the impression that a small investor like you and me will come out with is that a volatile stock market is bad. The reason given for this is that it is difficult to predict where the market is heading in the short-term so it is better to stay out of it (i.e. sell what you have!)

One thing I have learned over the years is that you never sell just because the market (or stock) has gone down and never buy just because the market (or stock) has gone up. Reasons to buy or sell need to be stronger than that.

If you're in the stock market for the long-term, then selling in a volatile market can be the worst action you can take for the following reasons:

1. Loss of income (if the stock is dividend paying).

2. Panic could set in due to falling prices and thus selling will result in a spectacular profit becoming a mediocre profit or even a loss. Stocks should only be sold following a rational argument.

So my dear investors, do not be afraid of volatile markets. Do not let your emotions control you - just hang in there. If you are feeling courageous, it might even be smart to buy on the dips. Remember that you can always say "no" to Mr. Market!

Tags:

 
Add to Technorati Favorites